ABSTRACT
CASE: A 13-year-old adolescent boy visited our hospital with a growing mass on his left leg. Investigations and examinations were performed to obtain a final diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma in the head of the left fibula with lung metastasis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was extended to 11 courses with radiation before wide tumor resection could be performed. The final 3 adjuvant chemotherapy courses were administered to complete the original protocol while surgical resection complications were also treated. The pathological report revealed free margin resection with nonviable tumor cells. CONCLUSION: An extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with additional radiation therapy for Ewing sarcoma provided extra local control and allowed limb salvage.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Sarcoma, Ewing , Male , Adolescent , Humans , Sarcoma, Ewing/drug therapy , Sarcoma, Ewing/surgery , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
A 17-year-old male with no previous medical history was admitted 2 days before his death to a local hospital after mild dyspnea. Electrocardiography, chest radiography, and blood analysis revealed no abnormalities. Blood oxygen saturation was 99%, and SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swabs tested negative; thus, he was discharged without prescriptions. After 2 days, the subject died suddenly during a pool party. Forensic autopsy was performed analyzing all anatomical districts. Cardiac causes were fully excluded after deep macroscopic and microscopic evaluation; lung and brain analyses showed no macroscopic pathology. Finally, a large subglottic solid mass was detected. The whitish neoplasm showed an aggressive invasion pattern to the thyroid and adjacent deep soft tissues and occluded the trachea. High-power microscopy showed sheets of small, uniform cells with scant cytoplasm; round nuclei; and small, punctate nucleoli, with immunohistochemical expression of CK8-18, AE1/AE3, and CD99. Using FISH analysis, the break-apart molecular probes (EWSR1 (22q12) Break - XL, Leica Biosystem, Nussloch, Germany) showed distinct broken red and green fluorochromes, diagnostic of Ewing sarcoma. The neoplasm was characterized as adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma, and the mechanism of death was identified as airway obstruction. The rarity of the case resides in the circumstances of death, which pointed to the possibility of sudden unexpected death due to heart disease, but an oncological cause and the underlying mechanism were finally diagnosed. The best method to perform autopsies is still complete, extensive, and systematic macroscopic sampling of organs and districts followed by histopathological analysis, in addition to immunohistochemical and molecular investigations in those cases in which they are necessary. In fact, when neoplasms are detected, the application of advanced techniques such as immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics is fundamental to accurately certify death.
Subject(s)
Adamantinoma , COVID-19 , Sarcoma, Ewing , Male , Humans , Sarcoma, Ewing/diagnosis , Sarcoma, Ewing/metabolism , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Adamantinoma/pathology , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunohistochemistry , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown has presented a unique challenge for sarcoma care. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early results and feasibility of surgeries for bone sarcomas during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: Our prospectively collected orthopaedic oncological database was reviewed to include two groups of patients- those who underwent surgery in the immediate 4 weeks before lockdown (non-lockdown group) and those operated in the first 4 weeks of lockdown (lockdown group). All patients were followed-up clinically and telephonically to collect the outcome data. RESULTS: Out of the 91 patients who qualified for inclusion, fifty were classified into the non-lockdown group while 41 patients formed the lockdown group. Both the groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic parameters. However, during the lockdown period 37 patients (90%) had undergone a major surgical intervention as against 24 patients (48%) in the non-lockdown group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in type of anaesthesia, median estimated blood loss and procedure duration. None of the patients/health care workers had evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 infection at 15 days follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that appendicular bone tumours can be safely operated with adequate precautions during the lockdown period.